Sell Without Surveillance
Bid2Sell showed vendors never have to pay to be found. RSP shows the market never has to be tracked to be matched. @rsp/property merges the two — and replaces the commission race with a three-pronged evaluation: what the agent has actually sold in this niche, whether they can serve you now, and the offer agreement they put on the table.
Legacy portal extraction
- –Vendors fund portal depth packages before a single buyer is qualified.
- –Agents buy suburb prominence; capacity to actually service the listing is never measured.
- –Where agents do compete, they compete on one number — the commission — and the vendor learns nothing about fit.
- –Buyer enquiry data is resold as leads, often several times over.
- –Behavioural profiles follow buyers across the open web long after the campaign ends.
RSP equilibrium
- +Vendors register for free and never pay for visibility — the intent signal is the product.
- +Agents are evaluated on three vectors: niche experience, ability to serve, and their offer agreement.
- +RSP recommends an equilibrium commission from experience and capacity; the agent may override it, openly.
- +Results are ranked by the Agent Equilibrium Score, rank 1 first — never by the lowest number alone.
- +Identifiers are burned on write: only coarse buckets and anonymised telemetry persist.
What agents actually compete on
The right to sell a property is not awarded to whoever names the smallest number. It is a three-pronged evaluation, and every vector is published to the vendor so the ranking can be read rather than trusted.
NEVNiche experience
Verified REIV history matched to the vendor's exact specification — category, price band, region — including days on market against the regional mean, sale price against reserve, and the buyer competition depth the agent has historically generated for comparable stock.
SCVAbility to serve
Real availability right now: workload stress S, actual against target volume V_A / V_T, consumer experience CX, and open campaign slots inside the timeframe the vendor nominated.
OAVOffer agreement
The commercial terms. RSP computes a recommended equilibrium commission from NEV and SCV; the agent can accept it or override it up or down, and the override is scored in the open rather than hidden behind a headline rate.
How a listing moves
- 01
Vendor intent
Property type, region, price band and timeframe — no name, address or contact.
- 02
Anonymised signal
Raw identifiers burned on write; the signal is a coarse, k-anonymous bucket.
- 03
Three-vector evaluation
Each responding agent is scored on niche experience, ability to serve and their offer agreement.
- 04
Ranked equilibrium
AES resolves who is genuinely best placed to sell this property today; the vendor selects from rank 1 down.
The Agent Equilibrium Score
The three vectors resolve into one published score. Servicing capacity is carried by the same VES the macro specification defines; niche experience is drawn from verified REIV history matched to the vendor's specification; the offer agreement is measured against the commission RSP itself recommends.
AES = 0.45·NEV + 0.35·SCV + 0.20·OAV
SCV ← VES = f(Relevance) × (CX / S) × (V_T / V_A)
An office already at 96% of its servicing capacity carries a high S, so its capacity vector collapses and it drops down the ranking even if it undercuts every other agent — not as a penalty, but because the service it is offering is one it cannot currently deliver. Equally, a cheap rate from an agent with no verified record in the vendor's niche cannot buy its way past an agent who has repeatedly sold that exact stock above reserve and has the slots free to do it again.
Commission is the one term the agent controls outright. RSP publishes a recommended equilibrium rate for each agent, and any override — up or down — is shown beside it. An unsustainable undercut is discounted rather than rewarded: an agreement the agent cannot fund is not a better offer.